On 16 June 2011 04:25, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:32, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Let's drop it unless there's someone with NT3.4 box out there to test it. > > Isn't this the kind of thing that shouldn't be done on a stable branch > (like zeromq2-1 currently)? > > I really would like to find Microsoft's official verdict on _WINSOCKAPI_ and hence the preferred mechanism for handling *winsock2.h*. Currently there is the hack from Microsoft listed previously which is incompatible with * mingw-w64* as that raises an assertion saying you must manually include first.
-- Steve-o
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
