[email protected] said: > > As for the rollback of 4.0, are there commits in 4.0 that are not in 3.0 > > that would want to be kept in the new 3.0-tracking master? I'm just > > confused as to why the reverting would happen if the plan is simply to > > make 3.0 master, and 4.0 'experimental', when you can just rename > > libzmq/master to libzmq/experimental, and push current zeromq3-0/master > > as libzmq/master. > > How would that solve the problem of separating the "stable" patchsets > from "experimental" patchsets? Whatever way you take you have to > manually inspect all the patches and move them either onto "stable" > branch or on individual topic branches. > > I am not against better way of doing this -- it would save me large > amount of ultimately boring unpaid work -- however, I don't see any > other way out at the moment.
I'm not sure that renaming the libzmq/master branch is a good idea, what would that do in practice to people tracking that branch in their clones of the repository? -mato _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
