03.11.2011, 16:54, "Pieter Hintjens" <[email protected]>: > I'd suggested before > that 'zmqmessage' wasn't an ideal name,
Yes, not ideal. I am sorry about this name. > since high-level bindings can > do a lot more than message handling: > > * automatically manage socket closure and zmq_term > * create properly-connected child threads > * provide reactors C++ simplifies resource management so maintaining socket lifetime is not as painful as in pure C. I am not a big fan of Swiss knife alike tools and don't understand why messaging library should control user threads, why GUI library should operate with DB, etc. Reactors are different. -- Best regards, Ilja Golshtein. _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
