[email protected] said: > Not sure I've convinced you that zmqmessage is a right thing for C++, > but I hope that I managed to give some reasons behind this design.
I think it's great that we have another more/different C++-like alternative to the very lightweight zmqcpp. I also prefer libraries to do one bit and do it well, Pieter is more a one-hammer-for-everything kind of guy, sometimes. Regarding SO_LINGER/blocking zmq_term(), it is a matter of opinion. Technically, your application will only block forever on zmq_term() if you have outstanding messages which cannot be sent anywhere. As for a better name for zmqmessage, how about zmqcppplus :-) -mato _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
