i have nothing in production ... but would want a path from 2.1 to 3.1 and
predictable path (to the extent possible) going forward.

So ... option 2.

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Joshua Foster <[email protected]> wrote:

> Option 2. I never really got far enough with 3.0 since I couldn't see a
> forward path from 2.1 to 3.0 to 4.0.
>
> Joshua
>
> On Nov 7, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> It's up to Pieter whether he wants to maintain 3-0 further.
> >> Pieter, what do you think?
> >
> > /me was expecting this to bounce back to me. I'm going to bounce this
> > back to the community since the only rationale for maintaining a
> > version is that there are people who need that version.
> >
> > So let's take a vote. These are the options I can see, please choose
> > one and argue / vent as you like:
> >
> > Option 1: maintain 3.0 through to stable, eventually deprecate 2.1 and
> > then start packaging 3.1 as alpha. Pros: it's consistent and gives the
> > impression we know what we're doing. Cons: it's insane because 3.1
> > speaks its own wire protocol incompatible with previous and following
> > versions.
> >
> > Option 2: deprecate 3.0 now, and start packaging 3.1 as alpha. Since
> > it's wire compatible with 2.1, people can test it immediately and we
> > should be able to push it through to maturity rapidly. Pros: simplest.
> > Cons: anyone using 3.0 in real life is kind of screwed.
> >
> > Option 3: remove labels from 3.0 and make it wire-compatible with 2.1
> > and 3.1. Continue with current release planning. Pros: gives us the
> > release story we should have had from the start IMO. Cons: not sure if
> > it's even possible.
> >
> > -Pieter
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to