As user of both 2.1 and 3.0.x, another +1 for Option 2. Changing existing code isn't too bad, and 2-1 compatibility is great.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:05, gonzalo diethelm <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Option 2 makes me happy that I could progress some time without >> > massive effort. >> > So I'm another voice for Option 2. >> >> +1 from me. > > For whatever it is worth, me too. > > -- > Gonzalo Diethelm > DCV Chile > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
