> For whatever it is worth, me too. In fact, I would also like to voice my opinion on something that is related to this: moving to a single git repo. I am convinced it should be possible to have a single repo with the following branches:
* master: publically available releases, with proper tags (v0.1, v0.2, v1.0, etc.) * features: separate branches for each "experiment" going on * development: cherry pick from feature branches in preparation for a release * release: used during the days / weeks when a new release is being prepared * hotfixes: where bugs are fixed for a release Basically, what's proposed in http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ Again, this is just my opinion, for whatever it is worth. Best regards. -- Gonzalo Diethelm DCV Chile _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
