On 11/11/2011 10:43 AM, Mikko Koppanen wrote: > Looking at > http://code.google.com/p/encmq/source/browse/trunk/src/zeromq/CMakeLists.txt > it's under GPL license. Is this problematic for us? Maybe we could > start from Steven's CMakeLists and expand from there.
I would say the license of the build tool doesn't affect the license of the built product. It may not work the other way round. Build system could possibly qualify as a derivative work, which means it should inherit the LGPL. In any case, I suggest asking Artem to change the license to LGPL first to prevent confusion about 0MQ licensing. It shouldn't be a problem as there are no practical consequences of GPL vs. LGPL for a non-library. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
