On 18 November 2011 07:32, Martin Lucina <[email protected]> wrote: > The other issue with CMake is obviously the extra maintenance involved. We > can see that there have been a couple of mostly one-off efforts to provide > a CMake build but until someone steps up to actually maintain such a build > there's no point in making it "official". > > I'm still settling in NY, I have a Chromebook and an iPhone now, not too constructive for Windows development. I'm settling with CMake at Thomson Reuters too as I'm covering one product using Visual Studio 2005 and 2010 on x64.
I have a sourcing issue with development hardware, standard desktop is an XP build and solutions vary from virtual machines, secondary laptops, personal laptops, and in my case abusing servers as desktops. I'm not sure how I'm going to wing a rather non-low budget fully loaded MacBook Pro but I cannot commit until I have something arranged. -- Steve-o
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
