27.12.2011 15:15, Martin Sustrik wrote: > Hi Sergey, > >> I've moved from 3.0 to 3.1, so I've got a chance to test my first patch >> more. I've found a stupid bug in it and fixed resolve_interface() >> function when it ignored an interface name. > > What was the problem with the first patch, btw? I've reviewed it and it > looked OK.
Accsidently local scoped defined variable: uint16_t port = (uint16_t) atoi (delimiter+1); instead of port = (uint16_t) atoi (delimiter+1); Fortunately you did not commit the first patch. And with the second patch I fixed a bug with inteface names. > >> Here is my second patch. Please, comment it. May be you dislike the last >> argument in zmq::tcp_address_t::resolve with a default value? > > I guess we should wait for Pieter to create zeromq-3.1 repository so > that the patch goes there. > > Martin > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
