On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:17 AM, MinRK <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe I am outvoted by those with philosophical objections to GitHub, > but every time I see one of these workflow update emails I hope that zeromq > is finally going to use GitHub for PRs and review instead of the > mailing-list.
This is my objective too and I don't think you're out voted. The point here isn't technical superiority either way but expectation of "ordinary" contributors and participants. Github is defacto a standard for our community, so we should use it fully unless there are objections we can all agree on. (e.g. issue tracking was too weak.) > From our experience after we moved IPython to GitHub, > contributions have simply exploded And exactly, this is the main risk of the core development: too few participants. It's not an idle correlation. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
