On 26/01/2012, at 2:54 PM, Martin Lucina wrote:

> 
> I would go with just calling unbind() or disconnect()
> with the char* you originally passed to bind() or connect().

That's exactly what I said :)

> 
> Semantics are pretty much the same; it is obviously an error to unbind
> () or disconnect() an endpoint which was not bound or connected in the
> first place.

You may be right, however that's not what my spec says:
when you disconnect you are disconnecting a SET of endpoints.

This is because connect/bind can be called with a char* to a buffer
which can be memcpy() into with the end point name. So all such
endpoints have the same char* address.

So since you're disconnecting a SET .. well there's nothing wrong
with an empty set!

Instead, the number of matched endpoints is returned by the function.
The client can then decide if 0 is an error  or not.

--
john skaller
[email protected]




_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to