On 02/07/2012 10:56 AM, john skaller wrote: > > On 07/02/2012, at 12:16 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: >> 5. That being said, using single socket from multiple threads is not a >> good design decision. It breaks the model of threads viewed as >> stand-alone state machines communicating with the outside world via >> exclusively owned sockets. > > Of course it does, because that's NOT the model of threads, > the model you describe is processes.
Fair enough. However, I am not sure whether there's a practical difference between the two. Do we have an use case where the current model of non-thread-safe sockets + ability to migrate sockets between threads is not sufficient? Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
