On 07/02/2012, at 1:05 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: >> Of course it does, because that's NOT the model of threads, >> the model you describe is processes. > > Fair enough. However, I am not sure whether there's a practical difference > between the two.
Threads imply shared memory, that's the whole point of them. > Do we have an use case where the current model of non-thread-safe sockets + > ability to migrate sockets between threads is not sufficient? Do you have a use case where existing Posix sockets/fds is not sufficient? -- john skaller [email protected] _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
