So the two main issues we need to fix are #264 and #270. They are, by all accounts, extremely hard to solve, and anyone finding a clean solution would be regarded with awe and admiration.
-Pieter On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Brian Knox <[email protected]> wrote: > Great news, Pieter. I just did a build of our rsyslog plugins against 3.1 > today to start testing. > > Brian > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> It's probably a good time to start moving 0MQ/3.1 towards stable status. >> >> Several things you can do to help: >> >> * If you have outstanding issues in 3.1 that you need fixed, please >> remind us of them >> * If you're maintaining a language binding, make sure you have 3.1 >> support in place >> * If you're maintaining documentation that refers to 2.1, time to >> start making a 3.1 upgrade >> >> We may be able to get all our projects ready for a 3.1 release >> candidate within 2-3 weeks. >> >> -Pieter >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
