Dear Ian, Indeed, adding a pause of ~350ms after the context termination makes the loop stable, however, it is too long to call it "low latency" :)
Is there any way to fix it without the delay? Or perhaps for my simple scheme of communication I should consider using windows named pipes? Kuba On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Ian Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Kuba <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Did anybody manage to solve the issue of windows running out of "socket >> space" that results in the mentioned assertion ? >> >> > Do your actually have those sockets open - it may just be you're trying to > reopen too fast. Can you try as a test adding a sleep(1) or similar just to > see whether Windows will free the socket if given a little bit of time? > > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
