On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Kuba <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Ian, > > Indeed, adding a pause of ~350ms after the context termination makes the > loop stable, however, it is too long to call it "low latency" :) > > Is there any way to fix it without the delay? Or perhaps for my simple > scheme of communication I should consider using windows named pipes? > > Kuba > The issue is really with the kernel so it's a bit tricky. Are you doing the bind() in a fast loop then, is it possible you could connect() in the loop, and bind() on the other side? Ian
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
