20.03.2012 22:40, Johnny Gozde пишет: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Boris Gulay <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > For me - not. I believe I'm using and old version of the binding. Can it > be true? > > > It's entirely possible. The latest stable version of clrzmq is 2.2.2, > downloadable from GitHub: https://github.com/zeromq/clrzmq/downloads Yes, I see. I see that latest version differs very match from 2.2.2. If I want to make some patches can I make it for stable version?
I see two disadvantages in 2.2.2: 1. Does not compile for WM. 2. Recv, in case NOBLOCK is specified and no data is available, returns NULL. Send, if NOBLOCK and HWM is reached, throws and exception. I believe, in last case we should have additional overloading that returns true if sending was successful otherwise false. Because, if reaching HWM is by design, examining return value is match faster than handling exception. > > Version 1 of clrzmq is no longer supported. > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
