21.03.2012 13:56, Boris Gulay пишет: > 20.03.2012 22:40, Johnny Gozde пишет: >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Boris Gulay <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> For me - not. I believe I'm using and old version of the binding. Can it >> be true? >> >> >> It's entirely possible. The latest stable version of clrzmq is 2.2.2, >> downloadable from GitHub: https://github.com/zeromq/clrzmq/downloads > Yes, I see. > I see that latest version differs very match from 2.2.2. If I want to > make some patches can I make it for stable version? > > I see two disadvantages in 2.2.2: > 1. Does not compile for WM. > 2. Recv, in case NOBLOCK is specified and no data is available, returns > NULL. Send, if NOBLOCK and HWM is reached, throws and exception. I > believe, in last case we should have additional overloading that returns > true if sending was successful otherwise false. Because, if reaching HWM > is by design, examining return value is match faster than handling > exception. Second option, as I can see, is already implemented in 2.2.2. It's good, so, only PocketPC fixes.
> >> >> Version 1 of clrzmq is no longer supported. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
