On 5/24/12 6:24 PM, MinRK wrote:
..
After a bit of discussion on IRC, this seems to be a pyzmq issue,
where the second
bind() call does not raise an error, as expected.
So I opened a bug there: https://github.com/zeromq/pyzmq/issues/209
As discussed there, it has been confirmed that pyzmq behaves no
differently from C in this regard, so it is not related to pyzmq.
You can bind multiple sockets to a single ipc channel, but only one
will be active at a time.
Yeah, sorry for the false conclusion,
I am not sure what's the rule here but it appears that the first one to
bind is the winner.
I am guessing this is a bug in zmq, right ?
Cheers
Tarek
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
