On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:41 AM, MinRK <[email protected]> wrote:

> PyZMQ makes no effort to test libzmq itself, so I would say that passing
> pyzmq's tests only gets you "probably not totally broken."  It took me about
> one day of using 3.1.1 to discover a dealbreaker bug for daily use (reported
> as LIBZMQ-369).

Nice bug.

> I do think think a Python test suite for libzmq itself makes sense, but I
> don't add tests for libzmq bugs to the pyzmq suite.

Indeed. It would be good to make a Python test suite for libzmq apart
from the pyzmq test suite.

-Pieter
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to