On 03/08/12 10:10, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > It seems a small breakage for a useful change... let's see if anyone > vetoes it. If not, I'd suggest sending the pull request.
How would it create breakage, though? Unless people are using boost::function<> or something of sorts, I don't see why anyone would have hard-coded the void return value? -S. _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
