On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Emmanuel TAUREL <[email protected]> wrote:
> My vote is in favor of compatibility. > If making 3.2 talk to 3.1 is "pretty simple", it could be added to 3.2 > even if it delays 3.2 by few days. > But will it also solve the other way round: 3.1 talk to 3.2? It's doable but who are you expecting to cover the cost of doing this, and on what basis? -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
