On Feb 5, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Michel Pelletier > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would propose then an extension to the ZRE beacon format. The original 22 >> byte beacon would still be valid, but another format of a different version >> would continue with: an octet describing the transport, and octet describing >> the service socket type, and 4 octets that contain the connect-back address, >> or something like that. > > That works for me. You can start a new spec for the beacon protocol, > or I'll do it. > > I'm wondering whether it's time to move our RFCs into github and work > on them using C4 and pull requests. Any thoughts on that? I can > probably get that working without changing the appearance (it'll still > look like a wiki, but would pull in content from a git repo).
Yes! I think applying C4 to RFCs is a great idea. cr _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
