> > > Personally I'd reuse JZMQ and make the low-level API a part of the new > > project. Over time you probably want to implement the HL classes directly > > over libzmq, and you can eventually deprecate the low-level API totally. > > Just for the sake of compatibility, I would keep clear of reusing names; > jzmq has had a lot of use so far, I believe it is better to come up with a > new name (package) for the new project. That way we will avoid confusion.
Absolutely agreed. I've been doing that in the jeromq project so far. I don't want to mess with the existing APIs and would never collide from a naming perspective (I'm using the jzmq APIs internally in a lot of places, so I *have* to use different packaging). John
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
