If I was working in C++ I'd build a proper high-level binding in C++. There are a set of abstractions that are really useful and which several bindings have implemented. See http://www.zeromq.org/topics:binding-abstractions
-Pieter On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Ivan Pechorin <[email protected]> wrote: > 2013/5/29 Michael Haberler <[email protected]>: > >> that leaves me guessing which zmq api I should use assuming I switch to C++ >> for that application: using the CZMQ C API in a C++ program, which calls >> upon the C++ binding indirected through the C layer strikes me as a bit >> awkward; or using the C++ binding directly regardless it being 'low level' > > Regarding the last option: IMHO the basic C++ binding (zmq.hpp from > https://github.com/zeromq/cppzmq) doesn't add anything useful to the > standard C zmq API (zmq.h). So, I prefer to use the standard zmq API > in my C++ programs. > > But in your case, given that you already have an application built > with CZMQ, I don't see any reason to switch to any of the low-level > APIs. You should be able to use CZMQ in a C++ program. > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
