Am 29.05.2013 um 09:36 schrieb Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]>: > If I was working in C++ I'd build a proper high-level binding in C++. > > There are a set of abstractions that are really useful and which > several bindings have implemented. See > http://www.zeromq.org/topics:binding-abstractions
jeesh, It's ToolTime Again! - I was hoping to just _use_ this, read the manual, peruse APIs and be done with it - just being Joe User ;) no offense - I wildly appreciate what is at hand; great job, thank you all! - Michael > > -Pieter > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Ivan Pechorin <[email protected]> > wrote: >> 2013/5/29 Michael Haberler <[email protected]>: >> >>> that leaves me guessing which zmq api I should use assuming I switch to C++ >>> for that application: using the CZMQ C API in a C++ program, which calls >>> upon the C++ binding indirected through the C layer strikes me as a bit >>> awkward; or using the C++ binding directly regardless it being 'low level' >> >> Regarding the last option: IMHO the basic C++ binding (zmq.hpp from >> https://github.com/zeromq/cppzmq) doesn't add anything useful to the >> standard C zmq API (zmq.h). So, I prefer to use the standard zmq API >> in my C++ programs. >> >> But in your case, given that you already have an application built >> with CZMQ, I don't see any reason to switch to any of the low-level >> APIs. You should be able to use CZMQ in a C++ program. >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
