Any particular reason? The natural extension of that philosophy is that I shouldn't bother looking at ZeroMQ because it's an existing library and I might be able to solve my problems other ways.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Lindley French <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > It would be really neat if we could integrate something like > > http://feclib.sourceforge.net/documentation.html into this. Not sure how > > that possibility would work license-wise, though. > > I'd recommend against looking at existing libraries unless they are > compelling answers to a problem we've not been able to solve any other > way. > > -Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
