Wow, that's fantastic. I'm really eager to get my hands on another wire protocol to turn into a neat little stack of RFCs! (I'm sure this is the sign of a deeply troubled mind. :-)
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Lindley French <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, I've got it building. I have no idea if it works because I don't fully > understand the design, and I'm pretty sure just commenting out the > encoder/decoder related lines was the wrong thing to do, but it builds now, > and that's a first step. > > The machine I'm on can't push and pull from github so I won't be able to > upload the changes to my fork just yet. I should be able to get that done in > a day or so. > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Lindley French <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Come to think of it, the way that library is structured, it would be >> > easy >> > enough to use it on top of ZMQ. Therefore it may not be reasonable to >> > integrate it anyway. >> >> Yes. My point was really not about pros or cons of libraries, rather >> solving one problem at a time, and getting a minimal plausible first >> step down. I'd really enjoy seeing a raw UDP transport that we can >> hack on. I'm hoping some unsung genius can pull off the impossible and >> bring that code in from XS, even in basic form. Once we have something >> we can improve it... >> >> -Pieter >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
