Thanks. Is it acceptable to backport zmq_proxy_steerable to libzmq 4.0.4? Or if not, when do you estimate the next stable release that would contain it?
Best, Cosmo On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: > CZMQ has its own steerable proxy so that it can run on older versions > of libzmq. Also, some optimizations, but that's secondary. Also, > wrapping libzmq's method is extra work, it turns out. > > The zmq_steerable_proxy method is quite recent so hasn't been wrapped > by other bindings yet. > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Cosmo Harrigan > <cosmo.harri...@singularityu.org> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. I took a look, and my understanding is that the > CZMQ > > zproxy class waits for messages from both a backend and a pipe (which is > a > > PAIR socket to expose the API) and updates a local variable 'stopped' > which > > ends the loop when the pipe receives the 'STOP' command. > > > > And it refers to that as a 'steerable proxy'. > > > > Then, I found that there is a class in libzmq called zmq_proxy_steerable > > (http://api.zeromq.org/4-1:zmq-proxy-steerable), which seems to offer > > exactly what I was asking about. > > > > Why isn't CZMQ zproxy using zmq_proxy_steerable? > > > > For C++ programming, cppzmq doesn't wrap either of those classes. Niether > > does zmqpp. > > > > So, I'm wondering, what pattern do other people who are using ZeroMQ in > C++ > > currently follow in this case to control their proxy loops? I suppose one > > solution is the one mentioned in the other thread, namely, wrapping CZMQ > in > > your C++ application. Any suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Cosmo > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: > >> > >> You can look at the CZMQ zproxy class to see one way to do this. > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Cosmo Harrigan > >> <cosmo.harri...@singularityu.org> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > What is the best practice when you are creating a loop that functions > >> > like > >> > the zmq_proxy device, to bind a PULL socket that is fed by a backend > >> > ventilator with a frontend PUB socket, in order to properly handle a > >> > clean > >> > shutdown? > >> > > >> > Most of the examples on the zguide just show "while (1)" with a loop > >> > that > >> > never terminates. What's the suggested way of signaling to the loop > >> > which is > >> > running in its own thread that it is time to shut down? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Cosmo > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > zeromq-dev mailing list > >> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> zeromq-dev mailing list > >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
