I think backporting the function is okay, but that would mean that
zeromq4-x should become 4.1.x, and libzmq should be bumped to 4.2.


On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote:

> We don't usually backport new functionality to existing stable
> releases, because it's been troublesome in the past (i.e. breaking
> things in bad ways).
>
> However, this is fairly safe and if you want to make a pull request to
> zeromq4-x with the new zmq_proxy code, I'll merge it.
>
> I've made an issue https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/929 that
> you can refer to in the pull request.
>
> -Pieter
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Cosmo Harrigan
> <cosmo.harri...@singularityu.org> wrote:
> > Thanks. Is it acceptable to backport zmq_proxy_steerable to libzmq
> 4.0.4? Or
> > if not, when do you estimate the next stable release that would contain
> it?
> >
> > Best,
> > Cosmo
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> CZMQ has its own steerable proxy so that it can run on older versions
> >> of libzmq. Also, some optimizations, but that's secondary. Also,
> >> wrapping libzmq's method is extra work, it turns out.
> >>
> >> The zmq_steerable_proxy method is quite recent so hasn't been wrapped
> >> by other bindings yet.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Cosmo Harrigan
> >> <cosmo.harri...@singularityu.org> wrote:
> >> > Thanks for the reply. I took a look, and my understanding is that the
> >> > CZMQ
> >> > zproxy class waits for messages from both a backend and a pipe (which
> is
> >> > a
> >> > PAIR socket to expose the API) and updates a local variable 'stopped'
> >> > which
> >> > ends the loop when the pipe receives the 'STOP' command.
> >> >
> >> > And it refers to that as a 'steerable proxy'.
> >> >
> >> > Then, I found that there is a class in libzmq called
> zmq_proxy_steerable
> >> > (http://api.zeromq.org/4-1:zmq-proxy-steerable), which seems to offer
> >> > exactly what I was asking about.
> >> >
> >> > Why isn't CZMQ zproxy using zmq_proxy_steerable?
> >> >
> >> > For C++ programming, cppzmq doesn't wrap either of those classes.
> >> > Niether
> >> > does zmqpp.
> >> >
> >> > So, I'm wondering, what pattern do other people who are using ZeroMQ
> in
> >> > C++
> >> > currently follow in this case to control their proxy loops? I suppose
> >> > one
> >> > solution is the one mentioned in the other thread, namely, wrapping
> CZMQ
> >> > in
> >> > your C++ application. Any suggestions?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Cosmo
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> You can look at the CZMQ zproxy class to see one way to do this.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Cosmo Harrigan
> >> >> <cosmo.harri...@singularityu.org> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > What is the best practice when you are creating a loop that
> functions
> >> >> > like
> >> >> > the zmq_proxy device, to bind a PULL socket that is fed by a
> backend
> >> >> > ventilator with a frontend PUB socket, in order to properly handle
> a
> >> >> > clean
> >> >> > shutdown?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Most of the examples on the zguide just show "while (1)" with a
> loop
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > never terminates. What's the suggested way of signaling to the loop
> >> >> > which is
> >> >> > running in its own thread that it is time to shut down?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> > Cosmo
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> >> >> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> >> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >> >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> >> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> >> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to