> thank you for the recommendation of JeroMQ - we were using it so far and it > is definitely a very nice project I have to say. But for our upcoming > project we need the best performance we can get and probably a multicast > too. These are the reasons why we are "forced" to use JZMQ ...
>From my performance tests, JeroMQ has higher throughput and lower latency than JZMQ. This has to do with the fact that crossing the JNI boundary and working with byte arrays are expensive. I agree with Benjamin, if you don't need security, domain sockets or multicat, there is no reason to be to choose JZMQ over JeroMQ. Performance use to be another one but it's no longer the case. _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
