With regards to multicast: is PGM planned for JeroMQ? Would this use the OpenPGM Java implementation? OpenPGM points to https://github.com/steve-o/javapgm , which was last updated a year ago.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Petr Postulka <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Trevor, > > thank you for the info about the performance ... good to know. > Unfortunately the multicast is quite important for us too. > > Kind regards, > > Petr > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Trevor Bernard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > thank you for the recommendation of JeroMQ - we were using it so far >> and it >> > is definitely a very nice project I have to say. But for our upcoming >> > project we need the best performance we can get and probably a multicast >> > too. These are the reasons why we are "forced" to use JZMQ ... >> >> From my performance tests, JeroMQ has higher throughput and lower >> latency than JZMQ. This has to do with the fact that crossing the JNI >> boundary and working with byte arrays are expensive. I agree with >> Benjamin, if you don't need security, domain sockets or multicat, >> there is no reason to be to choose JZMQ over JeroMQ. Performance use >> to be another one but it's no longer the case. >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
