ok, i will do so. can you make a 3.0.0 czmq package and put it somewhere on the website, please?
On Oct 14, 2014, at 2:31 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Andrew Hume <[email protected]> wrote: > >> (its a pain to switch versions; it was the >> change in zstr_send that caused me the most annoyance, >> please don’t do that again — much better to have named >> the new zstr_send something like zstr_sends (for send string) >> than to reuse the name.) > > Ah, this was unfortunate, though we did discuss it (I assume on the > CZMQ issue tracker). The zstr_send method and some others accepted a > format string, without any indication in the name. This was a security > risk and we felt it was better to close that hole and keep the API > clean rather than leave the dangerous method there and find another > name. > > Some similar changes in zmsg_pushstr -> zmsg_pushstrf. > > I apologize, the original poor design was my fault and we should have > caught it before 2.0.0. > > My advice would be to use libzmq 4.0.5 and the current CZMQ master, > which will be 3.0.0. It should support the CZMQ 2.x API correctly. > > -Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > ----------------------- Andrew Hume 949-707-1964 (VO) [email protected]
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
