Just leave the UDP .. I use UDP as a separate channel and its so different that it should always be considered different eg no guarantee , no packet > 64K / MTU etc etc Forcing it to the sane structure is likely to be a bad idea.
Ben On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:10 AM, TL;DR <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, I just wanted to kick this conversation again. > > Does anyone have any pointers to patches or experimental versions that > provide UDP datagram transport without PGM? Just plain UDP for > unicast/multicast. > > I have migrated pretty much all services in a system over to ZeroMQ. But > there is a use case where I use UDP today, and haven't been able to do so. > I'm thinking there must be others (esp in finance) who are in the same boat. > > PGM is a non-starter because auto-magical but late delivery is worse for > us than no delivery in this use case. These particular applications have > more complex behavior when they have missed something, and there is a > favored application level mechanism for detection of missed messages and > recovery. > > Thanks for any advice, > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
