Zeromq now have UDP transport, which you can use with the radio-dish socket types.
No docs yet so take a look at the following test: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/blob/master/tests/test_udp.cpp Both multicast and unicast should work. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Ben Kloosterman <[email protected]> wrote: > Just leave the UDP .. I use UDP as a separate channel and its so > different that it should always be considered different eg no guarantee , > no packet > 64K / MTU etc etc Forcing it to the sane structure is likely > to be a bad idea. > > Ben > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:10 AM, TL;DR <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, I just wanted to kick this conversation again. >> >> Does anyone have any pointers to patches or experimental versions that >> provide UDP datagram transport without PGM? Just plain UDP for >> unicast/multicast. >> >> I have migrated pretty much all services in a system over to ZeroMQ. But >> there is a use case where I use UDP today, and haven't been able to do so. >> I'm thinking there must be others (esp in finance) who are in the same boat. >> >> PGM is a non-starter because auto-magical but late delivery is worse for >> us than no delivery in this use case. These particular applications have >> more complex behavior when they have missed something, and there is a >> favored application level mechanism for detection of missed messages and >> recovery. >> >> Thanks for any advice, >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
