Hi Luca, The environment is: - Ubuntu 16.04 (but I tested also on Centos 7 same result) - gcc 5.3.0 compiled from sources with default options (NOTE this is not gcc 5.5.0) - glibc 2.22 - libstdc++.so.6.0.21
Before update IIRC the tests were passing except for random failures of test_security_zap. Francesco 2017-11-21 16:30 GMT+01:00 Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>: > Thanks for the report, unfortunately I can't repro with GCC 5.5 (the > closest I can get on Debian to 5.3). What's the full environment? OS, > libc, libstdc++ > > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 14:30 +0100, Francesco wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > I grabbed latest libzmq-master and rebuilt it with the GCC for our > > production software (gcc 5.3) and I always get the following test > > failure: > > > > ==================================== > > zeromq 4.2.3: ./test-suite.log > > ==================================== > > > > # TOTAL: 90 > > # PASS: 89 > > # SKIP: 0 > > # XFAIL: 0 > > # FAIL: 1 > > # XPASS: 0 > > # ERROR: 0 > > > > .. contents:: :depth: 2 > > > > FAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed > > ============================ > > > > lt-test_req_relaxed: tests/test_req_relaxed.cpp:118: int main(): > > Assertion > > `events == 2' failed. > > FAIL tests/test_req_relaxed (exit status: 134) > > > > > > I will try to debug that in the next days as soon as I have some > > time... > > Btw I'm building WITHOUT libsodium and with draft features turned > > on. I > > don't know if this makes any difference. > > > > Francesco > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-11-17 19:00 GMT+01:00 Brian Knox via zeromq-dev < > > [email protected]>: > > > > > Hi Luca! I'll run some of my test suites against it later today and > > > see if > > > anything breaks. > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@gmail > > > .com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > With https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/2733 duct-taped the > > > > major > > > > blocker for releasing libzmq 4.2.3 is gone. I am currently > > > > compiling > > > > the changelog. > > > > > > > > It would be great if folks with applications using 4.2.2 could > > > > test > > > > 4.2.3 and report any regressions that they eventually find. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Luca Boccassi_______________________________________________ > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > -- > Kind regards, > Luca Boccassi > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
