Thanks, and good point - that change should be in the NEWS, added: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/2851
On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 11:39 +0100, brunobodin . wrote: > Hi Luca > > I am also testing my application with zmq 4.2.3, which is mostly > windows > appliciation. I still have some issues to investigate (for now I got > caught > by the edtimeout => eagain change on zmq_poll_wait), > I will tell as soon as I know more. > > Bruno > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@gmail.c > om> > wrote: > > > Great, thank you! > > > > On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 16:43 +0100, Francesco wrote: > > > Hi Luca, > > > I investigated a little more this issue today and I spotted that > > > it > > > was a > > > false alarm. > > > Long story short: for several reasons I need to store shared > > > libraries in a > > > specific place (not inside Linux standard folders); to ensure my > > > binaries > > > can find the shared libraries I inject into libzmq the GCC > > > -Xlinker > > > -rpath > > > /my/path option. The result is that regardless of libtool > > > automagic > > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH adjustments the tests were running against the > > > outdated > > > libzmq version inside /my/path. After updating > > > /my/path/libzmq.so.5.1.3 the > > > tests pass just fine, included test_req_relaxed. > > > > > > I will start testing libzmq in my company's bigger software next > > > week > > > and > > > will let you know... > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Francesco > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-11-21 17:10 GMT+01:00 Luca Boccassi <luca.bocca...@gmail.com > > > >: > > > > > > > The closest I can get to that is on the Ubuntu 16.04 OBS build, > > > > where > > > > the test passes: > > > > > > > > https://build.opensuse.org/build/network:messaging:zeromq:git-d > > > > raft > > > > /xUb > > > > untu_16.04/x86_64/libzmq/_log > > > > > > > > Ubuntu 16.04, gcc 5.3.1, libc 2.23, libstdc++ 5.3.1 - not quite > > > > the > > > > same, but couldn't see how it could affect that test :-/ > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 16:59 +0100, Francesco wrote: > > > > > Hi Luca, > > > > > The environment is: > > > > > - Ubuntu 16.04 (but I tested also on Centos 7 same result) > > > > > - gcc 5.3.0 compiled from sources with default > > > > > options (NOTE > > > > > this is > > > > > not gcc 5.5.0) > > > > > - glibc 2.22 > > > > > - libstdc++.so.6.0.21 > > > > > > > > > > Before update IIRC the tests were passing except for random > > > > > failures > > > > > of > > > > > test_security_zap. > > > > > > > > > > Francesco > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-11-21 16:30 GMT+01:00 Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@gmail > > > > > .com > > > > > > : > > > > > > Thanks for the report, unfortunately I can't repro with GCC > > > > > > 5.5 > > > > > > (the > > > > > > closest I can get on Debian to 5.3). What's the full > > > > > > environment? > > > > > > OS, > > > > > > libc, libstdc++ > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 14:30 +0100, Francesco wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Luca, > > > > > > > I grabbed latest libzmq-master and rebuilt it with the > > > > > > > GCC > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > production software (gcc 5.3) and I always get the > > > > > > > following > > > > > > > test > > > > > > > failure: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==================================== > > > > > > > zeromq 4.2.3: ./test-suite.log > > > > > > > ==================================== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > # TOTAL: 90 > > > > > > > # PASS: 89 > > > > > > > # SKIP: 0 > > > > > > > # XFAIL: 0 > > > > > > > # FAIL: 1 > > > > > > > # XPASS: 0 > > > > > > > # ERROR: 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .. contents:: :depth: 2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed > > > > > > > ============================ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lt-test_req_relaxed: tests/test_req_relaxed.cpp:118: int > > > > > > > main(): > > > > > > > Assertion > > > > > > > `events == 2' failed. > > > > > > > FAIL tests/test_req_relaxed (exit status: 134) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will try to debug that in the next days as soon as I > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > time... > > > > > > > Btw I'm building WITHOUT libsodium and with draft > > > > > > > features > > > > > > > turned > > > > > > > on. I > > > > > > > don't know if this makes any difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Francesco > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-11-17 19:00 GMT+01:00 Brian Knox via zeromq-dev < > > > > > > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Luca! I'll run some of my test suites against it > > > > > > > > later > > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > see if > > > > > > > > anything breaks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM Luca Boccassi > > > > > > > > <luca.boccas > > > > > > > > si@g > > > > > > > > mail > > > > > > > > .com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/2733 > > > > > > > > > duct- > > > > > > > > > taped > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > major > > > > > > > > > blocker for releasing libzmq 4.2.3 is gone. I am > > > > > > > > > currently > > > > > > > > > compiling > > > > > > > > > the changelog. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be great if folks with applications using > > > > > > > > > 4.2.2 > > > > > > > > > could > > > > > > > > > test > > > > > > > > > 4.2.3 and report any regressions that they eventually > > > > > > > > > find. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > Luca > > > > > > > > > Boccassi_____________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > __ > > > > > > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > > > > > > > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > > > > > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > > > > > > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > > > > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > > > > > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > > > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Luca Boccassi > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > > > > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > > > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Luca Boccassi > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > -- > > Kind regards, > > Luca Boccassi > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
