Sorry i cant follow you. 50000000000 total size 50000000000÷1024 = 48828125kbytes 48828125÷1024=47683,715820313mbytes 47683,715820313÷1024=46,566128731gbyte 10gbits/s /8 = 1,5gbytes/s 46,566128731gbyte÷1,5gbyte/s=31,044085821 seconds I guest some thing is not ok but should be like that i think.
Em qua, 5 de set de 2018 às 14:59, Jasper Jaspers <[email protected]> escreveu: > In my setup I have two nodes connected via a 10 gigabit switch. I ran > iperf and zeroMQ throughput (local_thr and remote_thr) to prove that I > could achieve full bandwidth and I'm able to: > iperf: > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 11.5 GBytes 9.90 Gbits/sec > > zeroMQ: > message size: 500000 [B] > message count: 10000 > mean throughput: 2474 [msg/s] > mean throughput: 9896.000 [Mb/s] > > I then wrote a simple zeroMQ request reply test application to measure the > "throughput" using REQ/REP socket. In this application the client runs on > one node and sends N (10000) messages each of size M (500000) and waits for > the reply for each message. The server running on another node receives > the messages and sends a simple acknowledgment reply message. The client > calculates the "throughput" based on how long it took to send all messages > and receive all replies. I'm seeing that it takes about 11 seconds to > complete which gives a throughput of 0.12 Gbit /sec. Are these results > expected due to the nature of the request reply sockets? Should I expect > to be anywhere near the full 10Gbit bandwidth with this test? > > -Jasper > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
