Hi,

Don't worry, it is confusing.

If you built from zeromq tarball, then you have libzmq, the original zeromq
engine written in C++. That's why I wrote that zeromq equals libzmq in your
case. I don't know about others implementations (like jeromq, engine
written in Java), but I would say that libzmq is the most feature complete
and most used engine so far.

Dne po 1. 4. 2019 20:19 uživatel jonetsu <[email protected]> napsal:

> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 20:00:20 +0200
> Michal Vyskocil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > However libzmq equals to zeromq for you. See release page
> > https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/releases tarballs are named zeromq.
> > That's more the historical coincidence.
> >
> > Nowadays zeromq is the project umbrella and libzmq is the C++ engine
> > implementing the zmtp and other protocols.
> >
> > Btw: I would personally use https://github.com/zeromq/czmq/ than
> > cppzmq. Czmq is very active project, which offer great C API built on
> > top of libzmq. Plus a lot more like actor model, configuration files
> > parsing, curve support via zauth and many more.
>
> Thanks !  However, please bear with me on this as it's still not
> obvious and I have to ask: is libzmq implementing features (zmtp, other
> protocols) not found in the umbrella zeromq that I've built ?
>
> libzmq could be more what I'm looking to use as a base, since I'm going
> C++, so there would be a difference between it and the umbrella...
>
> Cheers.
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to