It's easier to think about ZeroMQ as the community and libzmq as the messaging library. I believe that's how Pieter was describing ZeroMQ at the end.
-Trev On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:45 PM Michal Vyskocil <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Don't worry, it is confusing. > > If you built from zeromq tarball, then you have libzmq, the original zeromq > engine written in C++. That's why I wrote that zeromq equals libzmq in your > case. I don't know about others implementations (like jeromq, engine written > in Java), but I would say that libzmq is the most feature complete and most > used engine so far. > > Dne po 1. 4. 2019 20:19 uživatel jonetsu <[email protected]> napsal: >> >> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 20:00:20 +0200 >> Michal Vyskocil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> > However libzmq equals to zeromq for you. See release page >> > https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/releases tarballs are named zeromq. >> > That's more the historical coincidence. >> > >> > Nowadays zeromq is the project umbrella and libzmq is the C++ engine >> > implementing the zmtp and other protocols. >> > >> > Btw: I would personally use https://github.com/zeromq/czmq/ than >> > cppzmq. Czmq is very active project, which offer great C API built on >> > top of libzmq. Plus a lot more like actor model, configuration files >> > parsing, curve support via zauth and many more. >> >> Thanks ! However, please bear with me on this as it's still not >> obvious and I have to ask: is libzmq implementing features (zmtp, other >> protocols) not found in the umbrella zeromq that I've built ? >> >> libzmq could be more what I'm looking to use as a base, since I'm going >> C++, so there would be a difference between it and the umbrella... >> >> Cheers. > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
