http://www.hindu.com/2007/06/20/stories/2007062071380400.htm

Karnataka - Bangalore

Khandre raises pitch for ban on book on social reformer Basaveshwara

Special Correspondent


Akhila Bharata Veerashaiva Mahasabha threatens to lay siege to Vidhana Soudha


Author's claim not based on proper research: Khandre
Ban will be against democratic rights: writer


Bangalore: The Akhila Bharata Veerashaiva Mahasabha has raised the
pitch for a ban on Banjagere Jayaprakash's research work "Aanu Deva
Horaganavanu" on the 12th Century social reformer and philosopher
Basaveshwara. It has threatened to lay siege to the Vidhana Soudha on
July 5 if its demand is ignored.

Mahasabha president and former Minister Bheemanna Khandre told
presspersons here on Tuesday that the author had committed an
"unpardonable crime" by raising questions about the parentage of
Basavanna, an icon of the Veerashaiva community. The author's claim
that Basaveshwara was from the Madiga community and was not a Shaivite
Brahmin, as conventionally believed, was not based on proper research,
he said.

Asked if seeking a ban did not amount to suppressing the freedom of
expression of a researcher and writer, Mr. Khandre said: "People
cannot say just anything in the name of freedom of expression." The
book, he added, had "indirectly insulted" B.R. Ambedkar and Kuvempu as
well.

On the proposal by the Government to set up a committee to investigate
the claims made in the Dr. Jayaprakash's book, Mr. Khandre said it
would serve no purpose and there was nothing to investigate.

'Intolerance'

Reacting to the controversy and the demand for a ban, Dr. Jayaprakash
expressed concern about the "atmosphere of intolerance". He said it
was an attack on the democratic right to do research and initiate
debates. "I am not asking anyone to agree with my point of view.
People are free to disagree and debate. But there should be an open
mind on it," he said.

'Great respect'

Dr. Jayaprakash said he had written the book with great respect for
Basavanna's poetry and his egalitarian vision.

The great philosopher did not need a "protectionist policy", and
stifling debate on him would amount to "limiting a great personality",
he said.

The agitation against the book was characterised by "unnecessary
aggression", which went against the spirit of Basaveshwara's
philosophy, he said.

The ban was being sought by only a section of the community, which was
seeing it as a "threat to the social hegemony".

Dr. Jayaprakash said "research could only be opposed through
counter-research" and not by means of a ban. He dismissed the charge
that the book insulted Ambedkar and Kuvempu as "completely unfounded".

Reply via email to