Africa Needs an Al Jazeera
  By Philip Fiske de Gouveia
  Foreignpolicy.com | June 2005
  http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3115&print=1
 
If G-8 leaders want to promote good governance in Africa, they 
should pave the way for a news network that will give corrupt 
politicians headaches all over the continent.

 
Africa has been at the front and center of this year's upcoming G-8 
summit. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has apparently made it his 
personal mission to deal with this "scar on the conscience of the 
world." In a welcome move, world leaders have agreed to cancel $40 
billion of debt owed by 18 developing countries, most of them 
African. An additional 20 countries may qualify for debt relief if 
they satisfy standards of good governance. 

But debt relief is not enough. Nor are conventional efforts to deal 
with Africa's numerous problems. To help tackle the traditional 
bugbears—the lack of foreign investment, low education standards, 
widespread disease, endemic corruption, poor infrastructure, and 
frequent conflict—politicians must now address a key variable in 
Africa's plight: its media. 

African countries cannot hope to democratize or prosper without a 
free press that informs the public, analyzes government policies, 
and raises concerns if segments of society are marginalized. In the 
Middle East, new media outlets have begun to become powerful 
catalysts for political and economic progress. Independent media 
that constantly hold African leaders' feet to the fire will help 
sustain reform efforts throughout the continent. In short, Africa 
needs its own Al Jazeera. 

It may seem strange to identify the Arabic-language channel as a 
model to be replicated in Africa, but if freedom is indeed on the 
move in the Middle East, Al Jazeera can claim a good deal of the 
credit. The station's broadcasts, which are available across the 
region, pressure governments to open up. In just nine years of 
existence, Al Jazeera has received hundreds of complaints from 
regimes not accustomed to scrutiny. Now, Arab governments realize 
they must justify their actions to millions of television viewers. 
That's why leaders such as Libya's Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi criticize 
Al Jazeera, yet eagerly jump at the network's interview requests. As 
a consequence, even hawkish American conservative Richard Perle 
recently conceded that Al Jazeera is playing an important role in 
encouraging the spread of democracy. Indeed, if a democratic Iraq is 
to be the first domino in a line tumbling across the region, the 
United States will need Al Jazeera to spread the good news. 

Today, the media market in most African countries is a mix of state-
controlled broadcasting and a limited, often self-censored, press. 
To remedy this problem, a partnership of African governments, 
entrepreneurs, and nongovernmental organizations, with the support 
of Western donors, should establish an independent, indigenous, 
multimedia, multilingual, pan-continental broadcasting network—owned 
and managed by Africans. Such an entity, broadcasting on television, 
radio, and the Internet, would push secretive governments toward 
greater transparency, foster economic and political ties between 
distant parts of the continent, and report honestly on events and 
trends affecting Africans. Had such a network been on hand to 
counter the malicious violence-inciting Rwandan media in 1994, the 
killing might not have assumed genocidal proportions. One wonders, 
for example, how the crisis in Sudan's Darfur region might have 
played out differently had the African journalists reporting on the 
ground been able to sooner to capture and broadcast television 
pictures of the tragedy. 

To be sure, tremendous obstacles stand in the way of establishing a 
pan-African broadcaster. There will be no shortage of African 
governments that aim to harass such a network. Some Western 
countries, such as the United States and Britain, may see such an 
entity as a threat to their carefully crafted communications and 
public diplomacy strategies. And a truly African network would have 
to navigate a number of complex issues, including language, content, 
distribution, funding, and regulation. 

These obstacles can be overcome. As Arab governments have learned, 
it is almost impossible to prevent people from watching satellite 
television or listening to transnational radio. There are also a 
number of private, Africa-based initiatives already under way whose 
expertise could be incorporated into a larger effort. Some, like the 
Africa Together Vision (ATV) project, are already investigating the 
feasibility of a pan-African TV channel; others, such as 
AllAfrica.com and Inter Press Service have become unofficial pan-
African news agencies. 

What's more, an African news network would be affordable. Al Jazeera 
was established with an initial grant of $140 million. The BBC World 
Service, broadcasting in more than 40 languages, runs on an annual 
budget of around $425 million. In the context of the $40 billion of 
debt recently written off by developed world governments, the sum 
required to create a pan-African broadcasting company—perhaps $300 
million—seems modest. To date, Western organizations such as 
Internews and the BBC World Service Trust have worked hard to train 
African journalists. It is time to take the next step. When they sit 
down to discuss African aid and debt relief next month, the G-8 
leaders should take a moment to talk TV.







--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to