Now history has us by the throat

  By Martin Woollacott
  The Hindu | August 11, 2005
  http://www.hindu.com/2005/08/11/stories/2005081106391100.htm

The West profoundly misunderstood how the Middle East works.

NOBODY NOW disputes that misunderstanding has paved every step of the
way in Iraq. The misunderstanding, or the lie, about Saddam Hussein's
weapons continues to be central to Western arguments about the war.
But, important as that issue remains, there was a more profound set of
misunderstandings of the social, political, and religious processes at
work within the Middle East.

They included especially the tense balance between Sunni and Shia, a
loss of diversity and tolerance in the Sunni lands, the real impact of
Ariel Sharon's long reign in Israel, and the effect of demographic
changes altering the politics of many countries in the region. It was
not that these things were not seen by experts, governments, or even
journalists, but that they were not added up, or were added up in the
wrong way. Some, such as the Shia majority in Iraq, were seen by many
only as an asset for an invader. Others, such as the collapsing peace
process, were categorised as requiring remedy but not, in spite of
much rhetoric, urgency. Above all, the interaction between these
processes, still continuing, was only partially foreseen.

For example, Iran's resumption of its nuclear programme this week is
the act of a government that, although it has serious internal
weaknesses, is in a position of strength in its international
dealings. The argument going on next door in Iraq over the
constitution is also one in which Shia Muslims are in a strong
position. In Lebanon, Syrian withdrawal may ultimately benefit an
already strong Shia community. In the Gulf and in Saudi Arabia,
suppressed Shia aspirations may not remain so for ever. These are all
aspects of a shift in power between Sunnis and Shias that always had
some potential for violence. But the way in which the Iraqi
intervention triggered a violent Sunni reaction — at least as much
among Sunnis outside Iraq as among those inside — to a potential Shia
gain may come to be seen as its most important, and its most tragic,
effect. To gloss over this only as "terrorism," and to see it mainly
in terms of a conflict between terrorists and the West, is to miss a
large part of its meaning.

A new kind of state

The Iranian revolution had given the region a new kind of state,
specifically religious and specifically Shia in a way that the Shah's
regime had never been. Much of what Saddam Hussein did during his
years in power was aimed at staving off a Shia succession, but,
especially with Iran's weight on the scales, change in Iraq could not
be delayed forever. That such a succession would have come anyway in
Iraq, and would undoubtedly have been accompanied by violence, is not
a defence of the war. It could well have been much less violent, and
it might well also have taken place — notwithstanding the existence of
significant jihadist groups — without inducing such an angry Sunni
reaction, for the American intervention gave an inevitable change: the
aspect of a Western-assisted Shia seizure of power from Sunnis in the
best-endowed of all Arab states.

Jihadist groups, initially more interested in expelling Americans from
Saudi Arabia, could also increasingly point to the deterioration in
Palestine as proof of encirclement and encroachment on the Sunni
world. They can still do so: Benjamin Netanyahu's resignation from his
Cabinet post this week portends a political contest in Israel, making
it even less likely that Gaza withdrawal will be followed by genuine
negotiations about the West Bank. The failure of the peace process
took place in a region that had lost some of its old diversity and
tolerance, because of the migration of minorities to the West, and
because of the emergence of more schematic forms of Islam. And it took
place in a world in which Europe had, as the American academic Robert
S. Leiken recently wrote in Foreign Affairs magazine, "in a fit of
absent-mindedness ... acquired not a colonial empire but something of
an internal colony, whose numbers are roughly equivalent to the
population of Syria."

The limbo in which some of Europe's Muslims live has suddenly become
an object of intense interest, for obvious reasons, again a case of
something often seen in the past, and indeed sometimes intensely
discussed, but rarely put into the larger context.

The reaction of some Sunnis — not just jihadists but people of all
classes, in Muslim lands and among the diaspora — has been to see
mainly and sometimes only that in Iraq a Sunni place is under siege.
It is a view that blanks out the fact that Iraqi Shias and Kurds are
Muslims, and that a majority of Iraqi Sunnis want to see the back of
the insurgency, although of course they want to see the back of the
Americans too. And it also blanks out the democratic argument, which
suggests another Western misunderstanding.

The Americans in particular are wont to see nothing underneath a bad
government except a people yearning to be free, and to regard the
secular middle classes of countries such as Iraq or Iran as the
authentic representatives of everybody else. Like it or not, this is
not always the case. In Iraq's war conditions, apart from Kurdistan,
these classes have been brutally targeted in Sunni areas and may well
end up being outflanked by clerics in the Shia south. In Iran the
recent election was a reminder that there is a third party in what
from the outside is often seen as a conflict between authoritarian
rulers and a liberal middle class. This third party may find itself
deceived in its choice in Iran, but it is a constituency of more
ordinary folk, with conservative Islamic leanings, a desire for clean
government and not much interest in issues of cultural freedom. It is
a constituency visible everywhere in the Middle East, in countries
that have democracy, such as Turkey, where it sustains the ruling
party, and in those that have little.

Historian David Fromkin has recorded that he set out to write an
account of how Europe changed the Middle East in the early decades of
the last century and ended up writing just as much about how the
Middle East changed Europe, mainly by wearing it down. Among the
things seen but not understood before Iraq were how our own societies,
mainstream as well as minority, would react. The majority have shown a
surprising willingness to operate on the basis of what is done is
done. They even seem resigned to the fact that, as Ayman al-Zawahiri's
words made clear last week, our freedom from terrorist attack is now
specifically dependent on events in Palestine as well as in Iraq. But
the readiness of Americans and British to invest more in the
enterprise is diminishing almost by the week, and the otherwise
incomprehensible plans for partial military withdrawal by both nations
are a reaction to that. As the American Iraqi expert Phebe Marr says:
"If you can't garner adequate resources — and public opinion at home
and abroad — to rebuild a nation, do not start." But we did start, and
now history has us by the throat.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hq50mjo/M=362335.6886444.7839734.2575449/D=groups/S=1705796846:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124979726/A=2894362/R=0/SIG=138c78jl6/*http://www.networkforgood.org/topics/arts_culture/?source=YAHOO&cmpgn=GRP&RTP=http://groups.yahoo.com/";>What
 would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?Donate or volunteer 
in the arts today at Network for Good</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to