Stirring the Hudood pot 

Nirupama Subramanian | The Hindu | June 27, 2006

http://www.hindu.com/2006/06/27/stories/2006062707221100.htm


CAN TELEVISION succeed where governments and non-government 
organisations alike have failed? 

In Pakistan, an ambitious private television station known for its 
campaign-style journalism recently took up the religiously sensitive 
issue of the Hudood laws for a debate on its talk show programme. 

Since 1979, when General Zia ul Haq ushered in the Hudood laws as 
ordinances, human rights organisations in Pakistan and abroad, 
women's rights organisations, lawyers and others have railed against 
them as unjust and discriminatory, and some Islamic scholars said 
they did not reflect the true spirit of Islam or the Shari'a. But 
their protests failed to move successive governments, democratic and 
non-democratic, into doing anything about the laws. 

Now, after a series of discussions with Islamic scholars aired on a 
programme called Zara Sochiye (Just Think), Geo, the TV station, 
says it has set the ball rolling for reform by showing a consensus 
on the need to change the Hudood laws. Ifthikar Ahmed, a host on the 
show and a prime mover behind it, said a range of Islamic scholars 
who took part in the programme — they were the only participants — 
had agreed on the need for amendments to the Hudood ordinances. 

"We have identified the problems, we have identified the anomalies 
in the ordinance, now we want Parliament to take it up," Mr. Ahmed 
said. 

Geo invested big money in publicity for the programme. And last 
week, after the debates ended, the TV station ran two-page 
advertisements in local newspapers with the slogan: "Thank you for 
thinking. When will Parliament think?" 

The term Hudood literally means limits set by God and the divinely 
ordained punishments to those who violate this. Geo coined an 
unwieldy tagline to its programme to make clear it was not 
challenging "god's limits" but only human interpretations of 
these: "No debate on Allah Hudood (Allah's laws as prescribed in the 
Quran and Sunnah) — Is the Hudood Ordinance (Man's interpretation of 
Allah's Law) Islamic?" 

Five ordinances make up the Hudood — against the offences of 
adultery and rape; drinking and sale of alcohol; theft and robbery; 
bearing false witness; and prescribing the correct procedure for 
whipping. The most contentious is the one relating to zina or 
adultery and rape. Human rights activists say that under this, men 
and women get caught in false complaints of adultery. The police 
immediately arrest those accused, even before four witnesses can 
verify that the man and woman did commit adultery, as the Hudood 
laws of evidence demand. 

On the other side of the coin, a woman who complains of rape must 
produce four witnesses to prove her accusation or may find herself 
charged with adultery and thrown behind bars. A National Commission 
on the Status of Women said in a 2004 report that 80 per cent of the 
women in Pakistani jails were there because they had been accused of 
adultery when they could not prove rape. 

The TV station says participants on its programme were united in 
making several recommendations for amendments, such as the police 
should not register adultery complaints unless the complainant 
brings four witnesses; that women accused of adultery should not be 
sent to jail; that when the court finds an accused innocent, it 
should automatically award the accusers 80 lashes; that pregnancy 
should not constitute sufficient proof of adultery. 

The response to the programme was "very positive," say those behind 
it. A Geo representative who did not want to be named said the TV 
station expected hate mail but "no one has been calling us to 
threaten or abuse us." 

In an editorial comment, the Daily Times lauded the show and the 
open debate on the controversial ordinances. The newspaper noted 
that before this the explosion of private TV in Pakistan had not 
translated into space for anything other than the views of orthodox 
clergy on Islamic subjects, especially after 9/11. "But after six 
years of freedom and `market-driven' Islamisation, the private TV 
channels are paying back good dividends," it said. 

Following the buzz created by the programme, Pakistan Television, 
the state-owned TV station, decided to run its own debate on the 
Hudood laws. A Supreme Court lawyer, Aslam Khaki, filed a petition 
as the programmes were being aired, challenging the provisions of 
the Hudood law before the Shari'a federal court, although he said 
the timing of his petition was not connected to the programme. He 
had challenged one provision in 1997 but his petition has not been 
heard even once. This time, Mr. Khaki said, there was more 
hope "because people are more aware" and "there are some points that 
have been agreed upon by the religious scholars," a reference to the 
TV debate. 

Still, it may be too early to proclaim a "consensus" across Pakistan 
on the need for reforming the controversial ordinances, or on the 
type of reform. While Geo advocated only amendments, many women's 
groups want a total repeal of the law, and are furious they were not 
invited to participate in the debate. 

"Where were the women on the show? Why was it a debate between men 
when the ordinance has to do mainly with gender issues? They were 
discussing amendments, we want the ordinance to be repealed," said 
Tahira Abdullah of the Joint Action Committee on Women's Rights. 

Ms. Abdullah said it was noteworthy that TV was actually talking 
about the issue, but said Geo had virtually negated 27 years of 
struggle by the women's groups for action against the laws through 
its gender-restricted "one-sided debate." She questioned the motives 
of the programme in not inviting a single woman participant. 

At the other end of the spectrum, evident from the PTV debate whose 
participants included a National Assembly member from the Muttahida 
Majlis-e-Amal, the six-party alliance of religious groups will not 
support even amendments to the Hudood laws, let alone a total 
repeal, if the matter ever comes up before Parliament. The party 
holds the key in Parliament to all matters that need a two-thirds 
vote. 

The contrasting views mirror the larger debate in Pakistan between 
those who want their country to be "secular" and those who believe 
that everyone who utters that word is an agent of the West and of 
the agenda imposed by the United States post-9/11, and therefore 
will do everything to oppose it. 

"The programme may have the achievement of showing that a few 
religious scholars agree on the need to change the Hudood laws. But 
it has done nothing to close the divide in Pakistan between the so-
called liberals who are part of the Western-imposed project to 
`modernise' the country, and those who are totally opposed to any 
changes precisely because they think it is part of a western 
agenda," said Khalid Rehman, director of the Institute of Policy 
Studies, a think-tank seen as reflecting MMA views, and that of it 
main constituent, the Jamaat-e-Islami. 

But Geo says it did not want to get caught in this "politicised" 
trap. The TV station says that as the laws were justified in the 
name of religion, it decided to take them for examination to 
religious scholars, and that is why no one else was invited to 
participate in the show, "not even political parties." 

Said Mr. Ifthikar Ahmed, the host of the show: "We have taken a 
step. Now it is for the others to take it forward," he said.











------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.  See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/uTGrlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to