UN must move from sound bites to action

Steve Crawshaw* | International Herald Tribune | January 24, 2007

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/24/opinion/edcrawshaw.php


During his first few weeks as UN secretary general, Ban Ki Moon 
seems to have had a hard time treading the line between his 
diplomat's desire to be Mr. Nice, and the requirements of a job in 
which speaking truth to power is essential.

Ban's reluctance to condemn the death penalty outright was 
dismaying, especially in the context of Saddam Hussein's execution — 
though he subsequently discovered stronger language. On other 
issues, he has made the right noises, but he must move from sound 
bites to action.

This week, Ban embarked on his first foreign trip as secretary 
general — arriving first in Brussels and Paris before heading on to 
Kinshasa and then Addis Ababa for the African Union summit meeting 
next week. This trip will give him the opportunity to show he 
intends to be a real leader on human rights — even at the risk of 
causing offense.

With the continued killing in Darfur, real pressure is needed on 
Khartoum — including from the secretary general himself. Even now, 
despite Sudan's resumption of indiscriminate bombing, and the 
spillover of violence into eastern Chad, there has been too little 
pressure for Khartoum to end its abusive polices. Instead, 
shamelessly, Sudan is even seeking to be elected as chair of the 
African Union at the meeting next week.

Some of the necessary diplomatic skills will come easily to Ban, who 
was South Korea's foreign minister before taking on the UN post. But 
gentle words only go so far. Outspokenness is needed, too — above 
all from the secretary general, with his international authority. 
Sudan continues to resist efforts to strengthen the African Union 
force in Darfur with UN troops. That must change. For huge numbers 
of civilians across the region, caution has already proved deadly.

In Congo, too, Ban must not mince his words about the scale of the 
problems still facing the country, though many will be eager for him 
to do so. After a series of wars resulted in millions of civilian 
deaths, elections last year brought some hope for stability. But the 
situation remains deeply unstable. Any weakening of the UN 
peacekeeping force, in size or mandate, could risk Congo slipping 
back into chaos.

On his return to New York, Ban must emphasize that human rights 
cannot be sidelined. So far, his much-repeated mantra has been on 
the importance of UN reform. Few would disagree that management and 
structural reform is needed. But what price better management if Ban 
does not provide a voice for the unheard victims of abuse around the 
world? Ban talks of the need for "harmony." So far, so genteel. But 
there is also the danger of a false harmony, achieved by placating 
powerful and abusive governments.

In some areas at least, Ban has sent positive signals, including an 
emphasis on women's rights. A United Nations panel recently 
acknowledged that the UN's own contribution to achieving gender 
equality has seemed "incoherent, under-resourced and fragmented."

That can change. But Ban's own commitment will be needed to make the 
panel's recommendations happen — including a more streamlined 
approach and the creation of a unified body responsible for gender 
equality which could at last be more effective in working, for 
example, towards the goal of achieving girls' full access to 
schooling.

Above all, Ban must help move things from fine words to tangible 
reality. World leaders agreed in 2005 on their shared responsibility 
to protect civilians from serious war crimes and genocide. So far, 
that policy remains mere rhetoric, as the continuing nightmare in 
Darfur vividly reminds us. With sufficient determination, Ban could 
move the policy towards reality for the first time.

He can also help reinvigorate the new Human Rights Council, which 
during the past year has been entangled in politicking of the most 
self-defeating kind.

Human rights are not a fringe issue, to be dealt with only once 
the "grown-up" issues of peace and security are out of the way. On 
the contrary, the protection of human rights promotes peace and 
security. In theory, Ban accepts the linkage, which his predecessor 
frequently emphasized. But in practice that means that boldness will 
sometimes have to trump caution. If Ban wants to be favorably 
remembered by history, he will do well to bear that simple truth in 
mind.

*Steve Crawshaw is United Nations advocacy director at Human Rights 
Watch.





Reply via email to