Russia: victim of narco-aggression 

Vladimir Radyuhin | The Hindu | 04 February 2008

http://www.hindu.com/2008/02/04/stories/2008020453271000.htm


Afghanistan's narcotics have struck Russia like a tsunami 
threatening to decimate its already shrinking population. In a 
country of 142 million people, there are about 6 million drug-users —
 a 20-fold increase since the collapse of the Soviet Union. 
Overwhelmed by a flood of drugs from Afghanistan, Russia says it has 
fallen victim to "narco-aggression."

The illegal drug turnover in Russia is estimated to be between $10 
billion and $15 billion, discounting transit trafficking. The 
Federal Drug Control Service said earlier this month that as many as 
30 million to 40 million people in Russia may have tried drugs at 
least once. Annually, some 80,000 Russians die of drug-related 
causes. One in five crimes committed in Russia is related to drugs. 

Narcotics have become an integral part of the youth subculture. In 
Moscow alone, narcotics are sold at about 100 discothèques and cafes 
frequented by the young, the city drug control service reported last 
month. About 45 per cent of Russian university students use drugs, 
according to Russian Minister for Education and Science Andrei 
Fursenko. He described the situation as "critical." The Moscow city 
government plans to introduce mandatory drug tests for all students 
in the Russian capital this year. Schoolchildren may be next in line 
for screening: some surveys indicate that four out of five young 
Russians are familiar with drugs. The Russian Parliament is planning 
to discuss a law to allow compulsory treatment of drug and alcohol 
addicts. 

President Vladimir Putin has described the drug abuse problem in 
Russia as a "national calamity." The catastrophic rise in drug 
addiction in Russia has been spurred by the painful transition from 
socialism to capitalism that Russia has been going through since 
1991. But external factors have played a crucial role. Last year, 
Mr. Putin bluntly stated that Russia and Europe faced "narco-
aggression."

The disintegration of the Soviet Union in December 1991 threw open 
the floodgates of drug trafficking from Afghanistan across Central 
Asia to Russia and further west to Europe. Overnight, Russia lost 
control over nearly 5,000 km of former Soviet borders in Central 
Asia and the Caucasus. At the same time, nearly 8,000 km of what 
used to be internal nominal boundaries between ex-Soviet republics 
became Russia's new state borders. 

In 1993, Russian border guards returned to Tajikistan in an effort 
to contain the flow of drugs from opium-producing Afghanistan. In 
2002 alone, they intercepted 6.7 tonnes of drugs, half of them 
heroin. However in 2005, Tajik President Imomali Rakhmon, hoping to 
win financial aid from the U.S., asked the Russian border guards to 
leave, saying Tajikistan had recovered enough from a 1992-97 Civil 
War to shoulder the task. Within months of the Russian withdrawal, 
cross-border drug trafficking increased manifold. 

Turkmenistan, another major opium route from Afghanistan, threw out 
Russian border guards in 1999. Since 2000, it has reported no drug 
seizures to international organisations. President Saparmurat 
Niyazov who died last year claimed his country had no drug problem. 
However, independent surveys indicate that up to half of 
Turkmenistan's male population uses drugs. In 2002, the country's 
Prosecutor-General Kurbanbibi Atadzhanova was arrested for operating 
a drug trafficking ring.

Seventeen years after the break-up of the Soviet Union, borders 
between the newly independent states are still porous and travel is 
visa-free. Air passengers arriving from Central Asia are routinely 
screened for drugs in Russian airports but if drugs are shipped by 
land, there is only a remote chance of their getting intercepted.

According to the Federal Drug Control Service, 90 per cent of the 
heroin sold in Russia comes from Afghanistan. In 2000, the Taliban 
banned poppy plantations and the next year opium production dipped 
to an all-time low level of 185 tonnes. However, since the U.S.-led 
invasion, the poppy fields have mushroomed again. According to the 
United Nations authority on drugs and crime, last year Afghanistan 
produced 8,200 tonnes of opium, enough to make a stunning 93 per 
cent of the world's heroin.

When Russia backed the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan to crush the 
Taliban and the Al-Qaeda in the post-9/11 scenario, it least 
expected drug trafficking from Afghanistan to assume gargantuan 
proportions under the U.S. military. The U.S.-led NATO forces have 
not only failed to eliminate the terrorist threat from the Taliban 
but have also presided over a spectacular rise in opium production. 
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Afghanistan was 
tottering on the brink of becoming a "narco state."

Narco business has emerged as virtually the only economy of 
Afghanistan valued at some $10 billion a year. Opium trade is 
estimated by the U.N. to be equivalent to 53 per cent of the 
country's official economy, and it is helping to finance the 
Taliban. 

"Unfortunately, they (NATO) are doing nothing to reduce the narcotic 
threat from Afghanistan even a tiny bit," Mr. Putin angrily remarked 
three years ago. He accused the coalition forces of "sitting back 
and watching caravans haul drugs across Afghanistan to the former 
Soviet Union and Europe."

`Waste of money' 


As time went by, Russian suspicions regarding the $1-billion-a-year 
U.S. counter-narcotics effort in Afghanistan grew deeper. U.S. 
former ambassador to the U.N., Richard Holbrooke, described it 
as "the single most ineffective program in the history of American 
foreign policy." 

"It's not just a waste of money. It actually strengthens the Taliban 
and al-Qaida, as well as criminal elements within Afghanistan," Mr. 
Holbrooke wrote in the Washington Post earlier this month. In 
December, Russian Ambassador to Afghanistan Zamir Kabulov told the 
Vesti 24-hour news channel that according to unconfirmed reports the 
U.S. military transport aviation is used for the delivery of drugs 
from Afghanistan to the American airbases, Ganci in Kyrgyzstan and 
Incirlik in Turkey. "If such actions do take place, they cannot be 
undertaken without contact with Afghans, and if one Afghan man knows 
this, at least half of Afghanistan will know about this sooner or 
later," Ambassador Kabulov said. "That is why I think this is 
possible but cannot prove it."

The Pentagon set up the Ganci Air Force base at the Manas 
international airport in Kyrgyzstan in late 2001 as a staging post 
for military operations in Afghanistan. The Kyrgyz government 
threatened to close the base after neighbouring Uzbekistan shut down 
a similar U.S. airbase on its territory but relented after 
Washington agreed to a one-off payment of $150 million in the form 
of an assistance package, and to pay $15 million a year for the use 
of the base.

It has been reported earlier that the CIA is involved in 
Afghanistan's opium production, or is at least protecting it. But it 
is for the first time that Russia has directly accused the U.S. 
military of involvement in heroin traffic from Afghanistan to Europe.

One of the best-informed Russian journalists on Central Asia, Arkady 
Dubnov, quoted anonymous Afghan sources as saying that "85 per cent 
of all drugs produced in southern and southeastern provinces are 
shipped abroad by U.S. aviation." Well-informed sources in 
Afghanistan's security services told the Russian journalist that the 
American military acquired drugs through local Afghan officials who 
dealt with field commanders in-charge of drug production. 

Writing in the Vremya Novostei daily last month, Mr. Dubnov claimed 
that the pro-Western administration of President Hamid Karzai, 
including his two brothers, Kajum Karzai and Akhmed Vali Karzai, are 
head-to-heels involved in the narcotics trade. The article quoted a 
leading U.S. expert on Afghanistan, Barnett Rubin, as telling an 
anti-narcotics conference in Kabul last October that "drug dealers 
had infiltrated Afghani state structures to the extent where they 
could easily paralyse the work of the government if [a] decision to 
arrest one of them was ever made." 

Open question 


It is an open question whether Russian charges of U.S. complicity in 
drug trafficking are based on hard evidence or have been prompted by 
Moscow's frustration at Washington's failure to address the opium 
problem in Afghanistan. But it is a fact that the U.S. and NATO have 
stonewalled numerous offers of cooperation from the Shanghai 
Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and the Moscow-led Collective 
Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO), a defence pact of six former 
Soviet republics. 

CSTO Secretary-General Nikolai Bordyuzha quoted a Pentagon general 
as telling him: "We are not fighting narcotics because this is not 
our task in Afghanistan." Instead of joining hands with the SCO and 
the CSTO in combating the narcotics threat, the CSTO chief said, the 
U.S. was working to set up rival security structures in the region. 
Washington was working to "drive a geopolitical wedge between 
Central Asian countries and Russia and to reorient the region 
towards the U.S.," Mr. Bordyuzha said last year. 

With the U.S. and NATO rebuffing their cooperation offers, Russia, 
China and the Central Asian states have to rely on their own forces 
in combating the narcotics threat from Afghanistan. Last year, the 
SCO and the CSTO signed a cooperation protocol aimed, above all, at 
curbing drug trafficking. At its summit in Bishkek last August, the 
SCO also decided to set up jointly with the CSTO an "anti-narcotics 
belt" around Afghanistan.



Reply via email to