Hello Roland, Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 10:31:37 PM, you wrote:
RM> Darren J Moffat wrote: >> James Dickens wrote: >> > I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem, >> > so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his >> > space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or >> > take 5000 snapshots its his filesystem, let him. If he wants to >> > destroy snapshots, he created them it should be allowed, but he should >> > not be allowed to do the same with carol's filesystem. The current >> > filesystem management is not fine grained enough to deal with this. Of >> > course if we don't assign an owner the filesystem should perform much >> > like it does today. >> >> Yes we do need something like this. >> >> This is already covered by the following CRs 6280676, 6421209. RM> That could be done if "zfs" would be based on ksh93... you could simply RM> run it as "profile shell" (pfksh93) and make a profile for that user+ZFS RM> filesystem... Maybe I'm missing something but it has nothing to do with ksh93 or any other shell. It should just work for a given user despite of it's shell, etc - just uid and proper privileges. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
