> This gives a nice bias towards one of the following > configurations: > > - 5x(7+2), 1 hot spare, 17.5TB [corrected] > - 4x(9+2), 2 hot spares, 18.0TB > - 6x(5+2), 4 hot spares, 15.0TB
In addition to Eric's suggestions, I would be interested in these configs for 46 disks: 5 x (8+1) 1 hot spare 20.0 TB 4 x (10+1) 2 hot spares 20.0 TB 6 x (6+1) 4 hot spares 18.0 TB In a few cases, we might want more space rather than 2-disk parity. Thanks. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
