Robert, On 10/31/06 3:10 PM, "Robert Milkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even then I would try first to test with more real load on ZFS as it > can turn out that ZFS performs better anyway. Despite problems with > large sequential writings I find ZFS to perform better in many more > complex scenarios. So in real life ZFS could actually perform better > in your environment than in that simple test. I'd withhold all judgement about sequential I/O until you've tested the fixes in snv_50+ We've seen more than 2,000 MB/s of sequential transfer rate on 36 disks. - Luke _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
